Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: No need to put forcewake after a reset

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:59:55AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:08:18PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need > > to do explicit put after reset. > > > > v2: rebase > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala > > --- > > driver

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: No need to put forcewake after a reset

2014-03-05 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:08:18PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need > to do explicit put after reset. > > v2: rebase > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 19 --- > 1 file changed, 8 in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: No need to put forcewake after a reset

2014-03-05 Thread Mika Kuoppala
As we now have intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() no need to do explicit put after reset. v2: rebase Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 19 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b