Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix some tracepoints to capture full 64b

2017-10-04 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 03/10/2017 13:50, Chris Wilson wrote: The tracepoints need some tlc, in particular we've neglected to update them for the 64b era. v2: Prefix hexadecimal output with 0x. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 44 +++ 1 fil

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix some tracepoints to capture full 64b

2017-10-03 Thread Chris Wilson
The tracepoints need some tlc, in particular we've neglected to update them for the 64b era. v2: Prefix hexadecimal output with 0x. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 44 +++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix some tracepoints to capture full 64b

2017-10-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-05-15 11:28:44) > > On 12/05/2017 21:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The tracepoints need some tlc, in particular we've neglected to update > > them for the 64b era. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 42 > > +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix some tracepoints to capture full 64b

2017-05-15 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 12/05/2017 21:21, Chris Wilson wrote: The tracepoints need some tlc, in particular we've neglected to update them for the 64b era. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 42 +++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix some tracepoints to capture full 64b

2017-05-12 Thread Chris Wilson
The tracepoints need some tlc, in particular we've neglected to update them for the 64b era. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 42 +++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_t