Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management"

2019-07-12 Thread Wang, Zhi A
It's quite a long time ago. I cannot fully remember the whole picture now. I remembered the last status was to push some unit tests and with the last part of patch. Currently I think you can revert this if it causes troubles, we can purpose this again if we need this in future. Thanks, Zhi. --

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management"

2019-07-12 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2019.07.12 11:06:01 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > + Zhenyu as FYI > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-07-02 14:56:04) > > Quoting Michał Winiarski (2019-07-02 12:31:48) > > > This reverts commit 4395890a48551982549d222d1923e2833dac47cf. > > > > > > It's been over a year since this was merged, and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management"

2019-07-12 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
+ Zhenyu as FYI Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-07-02 14:56:04) > Quoting Michał Winiarski (2019-07-02 12:31:48) > > This reverts commit 4395890a48551982549d222d1923e2833dac47cf. > > > > It's been over a year since this was merged, and the actual users of > > intel_ppat_get / intel_ppat_put never mate

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management"

2019-07-02 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Michał Winiarski (2019-07-02 12:31:48) > This reverts commit 4395890a48551982549d222d1923e2833dac47cf. > > It's been over a year since this was merged, and the actual users of > intel_ppat_get / intel_ppat_put never materialized. > > Time to remove it! > > v2: Unbreak suspend (Chris) > v

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm/i915: Introduce private PAT management"

2019-07-02 Thread Michał Winiarski
This reverts commit 4395890a48551982549d222d1923e2833dac47cf. It's been over a year since this was merged, and the actual users of intel_ppat_get / intel_ppat_put never materialized. Time to remove it! v2: Unbreak suspend (Chris) v3: Rebase, drop fixes tag to avoid confusion Signed-off-by: Mich