On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 12:18 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:37PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock
> > reference
> > for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM
> > atomic sequence
> > count
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:37PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock reference
> for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM atomic
> sequence
> counter that we increment any time the wakelock refcount drops to zero.
>
On ti, 2015-12-15 at 20:10 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock
> reference
> for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM
> atomic sequence
> counter that we increment any time the wakelock refcount drops to
> zero.
> Check
In some cases we want to check whether we hold an RPM wakelock reference
for the whole duration of a sequence. To achieve this add a new RPM atomic
sequence
counter that we increment any time the wakelock refcount drops to zero.
Check whether the sequence number stays the same during the atomic
se
