Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915: drop register special-casing in forcewake

2011-12-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:21:27 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 16:05, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter > > wrote: > >> We currently have 3 register for which we must not grab forcewake for: > >> FORCEWAKE, FROCEWAKE_MT and ECOBUS. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915: drop register special-casing in forcewake

2011-12-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 16:05, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter > wrote: >> We currently have 3 register for which we must not grab forcewake for: >> FORCEWAKE, FROCEWAKE_MT and ECOBUS. >> - FORCEWAKE is excluded in the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE macro and accessed >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915: drop register special-casing in forcewake

2011-12-14 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:57:05 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We currently have 3 register for which we must not grab forcewake for: > FORCEWAKE, FROCEWAKE_MT and ECOBUS. > - FORCEWAKE is excluded in the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE macro and accessed > with _NOTRACE. > - FORCEWAKE_MT is just accessed with _N

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915: drop register special-casing in forcewake

2011-12-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
We currently have 3 register for which we must not grab forcewake for: FORCEWAKE, FROCEWAKE_MT and ECOBUS. - FORCEWAKE is excluded in the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE macro and accessed with _NOTRACE. - FORCEWAKE_MT is just accessed with _NOTRACE. - ECOBUS is only excluded in the macro. In fear of an ever-g