Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2013-05-31 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:19:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:22:24PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the > > interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone > > when we begin to handle

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2013-05-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:22:24PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the > interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone > when we begin to handle those. > > The slight functional change in this patch (queueing work

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2013-05-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone when we begin to handle those. The slight functional change in this patch (queueing work while holding the spinlock) is intentional as it makes a subsequent patc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2013-05-28 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:19PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the > interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone > when we begin to handle those. > > The slight functional change in this patch (queueing work

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2013-04-27 Thread Ben Widawsky
HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone when we begin to handle those. The slight functional change in this patch (queueing work while holding the spinlock) is intentional as it makes a subsequent patc

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915: Create a more generic pm handler for hsw+

2012-11-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
HSW has some special requirements for the VEBOX. Splitting out the interrupt handler will make the code a bit nicer and less error prone when we begin to handle those. The slight functional change in this patch (queueing work while holding the spinlock) is intentional as it makes a subsequent patc