On 24/11/15 15:25, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:08:09PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 20/11/15 12:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
request.
Signe
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:08:09PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 20/11/15 12:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
> >and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
> >request.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
>
On 20/11/15 12:43, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:43:47PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
> and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
> request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
> ---
> drivers/gpu/d
Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h| 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c| 28 +++---
drivers/g
