; VAT No: 860 2173 47
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Vetter
> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:50 PM
> > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter; Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists
May 19, 2014 5:24 PM
> > > > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > > > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
> > > >
> > > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Volkin, Bradley D
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:41 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
>
> On Mon,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:33:37AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Volkin, Bradley D
> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:24 PM
> > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Volkin, Bradley D
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 5:24 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
>
> On Mon,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:12:26AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> BTW: do you want me to kill private_default_ctx as well? It doesn´t look very
> useful...
Isn't private_default_ctx the one that's actually used when userspace
specifies DEFAULT_CONTEXT_ID?
Brad
> ___
Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:50 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Daniel Vetter; Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:09PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > I think special-casing the i915_gem_context_get function for the default
> > context and using private_default_ctx a bit more sounds good. We need to
> > adjust the idr allocator a bit though to reserve 0, and a bit of frobbin
t; > > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:53 PM
> > > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > > Cc: Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
> > >
> > > On
> Cc: Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/d
> -Original Message-
> From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of
> Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:53 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Lespiau, Damien; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index 108e1ec2fa4b..e34db43dead3
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1825,7 +1825,9 @@ str
Daniel Vetter
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:52 PM
> > > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> > > Cc: Lespiau, Damien; Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_
ozano, Oscar
> > Cc: Lespiau, Damien; Daniel Vetter; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
> >
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:17:23PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > &
> To: Daniel Vetter
> > > Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> > > s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:17:23PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lespiau, Damien
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:26 PM
> > To: Daniel Vetter
> > Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Lespiau, Damien
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:26 PM
> To: Daniel Vetter
> Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915:
> s/intel_ring_buffer/intel_engine
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:28:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:08:36PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Oscar Mateo
> >
> > In the upcoming patches, we plan to break the correlation between
> > engines (a.k.a. rings) and ringbuffers, so it makes sense to
18 matches
Mail list logo
