Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/icl: Do not fix dbuf block size to 512

2018-01-29 Thread James Ausmus
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:07:30PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Mahesh Kumar > > GEN9/10 had fixed DBuf block size of 512. Dbuf block size is not a > fixed number anymore in GEN11, it varies according to bits per pixel > and tiling. If 8bpp & Yf-tile surface, block size = 256 else block > s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/icl: Do not fix dbuf block size to 512

2018-01-29 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Mahesh Kumar GEN9/10 had fixed DBuf block size of 512. Dbuf block size is not a fixed number anymore in GEN11, it varies according to bits per pixel and tiling. If 8bpp & Yf-tile surface, block size = 256 else block size = 512 This patch addresses the same. v2 (from Paulo): - Make it co

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/icl: Do not fix dbuf block size to 512

2018-01-23 Thread James Ausmus
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:05:25PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Mahesh Kumar > > GEN9/10 had fixed DBuf block size of 512. Dbuf block size is not a > fixed number anymore in GEN11, it varies according to bits per pixel > and tiling. If 8bpp & Yf-tile surface, block size = 256 else block > s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/icl: Do not fix dbuf block size to 512

2018-01-23 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Mahesh Kumar GEN9/10 had fixed DBuf block size of 512. Dbuf block size is not a fixed number anymore in GEN11, it varies according to bits per pixel and tiling. If 8bpp & Yf-tile surface, block size = 256 else block size = 512 This patch addresses the same. v2 (from Paulo): - Make it co