Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce spt_irq_handler()

2015-08-27 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:13:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:38:25AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > 2015-08-12 12:44 GMT-03:00 : > > >> From: Ville Syrjälä > > >> > > >> Starting from SPT the only interrupts living in t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce spt_irq_handler()

2015-08-27 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:38:25AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > 2015-08-12 12:44 GMT-03:00 : > >> From: Ville Syrjälä > >> > >> Starting from SPT the only interrupts living in the south are GMBUS and > >> HPD. What's worse some of the SPT specific new

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce spt_irq_handler()

2015-08-27 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2015-08-12 12:44 GMT-03:00 : >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> Starting from SPT the only interrupts living in the south are GMBUS and >> HPD. What's worse some of the SPT specific new bits conflict with some >> other bits on earlier PCH generations. So bett

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce spt_irq_handler()

2015-08-26 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2015-08-12 12:44 GMT-03:00 : > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Starting from SPT the only interrupts living in the south are GMBUS and > HPD. What's worse some of the SPT specific new bits conflict with some > other bits on earlier PCH generations. So better not use the > cpt_irq_handler() for SPT+ anymo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Introduce spt_irq_handler()

2015-08-12 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Starting from SPT the only interrupts living in the south are GMBUS and HPD. What's worse some of the SPT specific new bits conflict with some other bits on earlier PCH generations. So better not use the cpt_irq_handler() for SPT+ anymore. Also kill the hand rolled port E han