[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions

2013-05-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd ring have the default *other* flush. As the new vebox ring exposes, the bsd ring is actually th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions

2013-05-07 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush > semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. > Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd > ring have the default *ot

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions

2013-04-27 Thread Ben Widawsky
Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd ring have the default *other* flush. As the new vebox ring exposes, the bsd ring is actually th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions

2012-11-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush > semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. > Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd > ring have the default *other* flush. As the n

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915: Rename ring flush functions

2012-11-06 Thread Ben Widawsky
Historically we considered the render ring to have special flush semantics and everything else to fall under a more general umbrella. Probably by coincidence more than anything we decided to make the bsd ring have the default *other* flush. As the new vebox ring exposes, the bsd ring is actually th