On ti, 2016-04-05 at 10:26 +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:34:30PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:02:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > So far we only power well enabling was synchronous not disabling.
> > > Since
> > > we don't exactly kno
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:34:30PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:02:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > So far we only power well enabling was synchronous not disabling. Since
> > we don't exactly know how the firmware (both DMC and PCU) synchronizes
> > against the actua
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:02:36PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> So far we only power well enabling was synchronous not disabling. Since
> we don't exactly know how the firmware (both DMC and PCU) synchronizes
> against the actual power well state during DC transitions, make the
> disabling also synchr
So far we only power well enabling was synchronous not disabling. Since
we don't exactly know how the firmware (both DMC and PCU) synchronizes
against the actual power well state during DC transitions, make the
disabling also synchronous.
CC: Mika Kuoppala
CC: Patrik Jakobsson
Signed-off-by: Imr
