[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init

2014-04-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any to do the split. Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point, put the proper "NULL" values in for the mbox info. v2: v1 had a stale

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init

2014-02-24 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19:18PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. > Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any > to do the split. > > Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init

2014-02-19 Thread Ben Widawsky
Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any to do the split. Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point, put the proper "NULL" values in for the mbox info. v2: v1 had a stale

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: gen specific ring init

2014-01-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
Gen8 has already had some differentiation with how it handles rings. Semaphores bring yet more differences, and now is as good a time as any to do the split. Also, since gen8 doesn't actually use semaphores up until this point, put the proper "NULL" values in for the mbox info. v2: v1 had a stale