Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915: Ensure cache flushes prior to doing CS flips

2015-05-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:41:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Synchronising to an object active on the same ring is a no-op, for the > benefit of execbuffer scheduler. However, for CS flips this means that > we can forgo checking whether the last write request of the object is > actually queued a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915: Ensure cache flushes prior to doing CS flips

2015-04-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Synchronising to an object active on the same ring is a no-op, for the benefit of execbuffer scheduler. However, for CS flips this means that we can forgo checking whether the last write request of the object is actually queued and more importantly whether the cache flush for the write was emitted.