Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Track active by VMA instead of object

2013-07-26 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:48:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Even though we want to be able to track active by VMA, the rest of the > > code is still using objects for most internal APIs. To solve this, > > create an object_is_ac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Track active by VMA instead of object

2013-07-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 07:08:11PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Even though we want to be able to track active by VMA, the rest of the > code is still using objects for most internal APIs. To solve this, > create an object_is_active() function to help us in converting over to > VMA usage. > > Beca

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Track active by VMA instead of object

2013-07-21 Thread Ben Widawsky
Even though we want to be able to track active by VMA, the rest of the code is still using objects for most internal APIs. To solve this, create an object_is_active() function to help us in converting over to VMA usage. Because we intend to keep around some functions that care about objects, and n