Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915: rip out GEM drm feature checks

2012-04-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:50:50 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We always set it so there's no point in checking. We could > instead add a bit that tells us whether gem is actually > initialized (i.e. either kms or gem_init_ioctl called), but > that's imho not worth it. > > So just rip it out. > > T

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915: rip out GEM drm feature checks

2012-04-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
We always set it so there's no point in checking. We could instead add a bit that tells us whether gem is actually initialized (i.e. either kms or gem_init_ioctl called), but that's imho not worth it. So just rip it out. There's a little change in the wait_ring timeout, but we've never run with a