2014-03-26 18:37 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter :
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> Anyway, we have discussed this and it seems everybody prefers to have
>> the POSTING_READ calls on the macro, so I'll just change the patches
>> to do this, and then the comment will disappear.
>
>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Anyway, we have discussed this and it seems everybody prefers to have
> the POSTING_READ calls on the macro, so I'll just change the patches
> to do this, and then the comment will disappear.
I think for consistency we should do the same chan
2014-03-18 14:11 GMT-03:00 Ben Widawsky :
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> From: Paulo Zanoni
>>
>> And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
>>
>> We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
>> sent a patch series for this: "[PATCH 00/15] Unify inte
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni
> >
> > And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
> >
> > We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
> > sent a patch series for thi
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
>
> We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
> sent a patch series for this: "[PATCH 00/15] Unify interrupt register
> init/reset". Now that the BDW c
From: Paulo Zanoni
And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
sent a patch series for this: "[PATCH 00/15] Unify interrupt register
init/reset". Now that the BDW code was merged, I have one more
argument in favor of these changes.
Here's
