Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm: Link directly from drm_master to drm_device

2016-06-16 Thread Emil Velikov
On 15 June 2016 at 16:45, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 14 June 2016 at 19:50, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Master-based auth only exists for the legacy/primary drm_minor, hence >> > there can only be one per device. The goal here is to un

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm: Link directly from drm_master to drm_device

2016-06-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 14 June 2016 at 19:50, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Master-based auth only exists for the legacy/primary drm_minor, hence > > there can only be one per device. The goal here is to untangle the > > epic dereference games of minor->maste

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm: Link directly from drm_master to drm_device

2016-06-15 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14 June 2016 at 19:50, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Master-based auth only exists for the legacy/primary drm_minor, hence > there can only be one per device. The goal here is to untangle the > epic dereference games of minor->master and master->minor which is > just massively confusing. > Good riddan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm: Link directly from drm_master to drm_device

2016-06-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:50:58PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Master-based auth only exists for the legacy/primary drm_minor, hence > there can only be one per device. The goal here is to untangle the > epic dereference games of minor->master and master->minor which is > just massively confusing

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm: Link directly from drm_master to drm_device

2016-06-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
Master-based auth only exists for the legacy/primary drm_minor, hence there can only be one per device. The goal here is to untangle the epic dereference games of minor->master and master->minor which is just massively confusing. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c |