On 03/11/2016 12:28, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:47:54AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 02/11/2016 17:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
@@ -600,9 +598,8 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
static void execlists_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:47:54AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 02/11/2016 17:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >@@ -600,9 +598,8 @@ static void intel_lrc_irq_handler(unsigned long data)
> > static void execlists_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> > {
> > struct intel_engine
On 02/11/2016 17:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
The execlist_lock is now completely subsumed by the engine->timeline->lock,
and so we can remove the redundant layer of locking.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |
The execlist_lock is now completely subsumed by the engine->timeline->lock,
and so we can remove the redundant layer of locking.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_c
