Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:30 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
On Monday 09 January 2017 10:47 PM, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 18:26 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 18:26 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)is set to 0.
> Also ,PSR2_ID
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
Rodrigo,
The code is
if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
/* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions
upto 3200x2000 */
if (crtc->config->pipe_src_w > 3200 ||
crtc->config->pipe_src_h > 2000)
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 00:55 +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)is set to 0.
> Also ,PSR2_ID
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 12:55:59AM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)is set to 0.
> Also ,
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 05:00:56PM +0530, vathsala nagaraju wrote:
> Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
> psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
> PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
> (psr1 control register)is set to 0.
> Also ,
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_S
13 matches
Mail list logo
