Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests

2015-12-16 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:16:19PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > Hi, > > On 14/12/15 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote: > >With the introduction of requests, we amplified the number of atomic > >refcounted objects we use and update every execbuffer; from none to > >several references, and a set of ref

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests

2015-12-16 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi, On 14/12/15 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote: With the introduction of requests, we amplified the number of atomic refcounted objects we use and update every execbuffer; from none to several references, and a set of references that need to be changed. We also introduced interesting side-effects in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests

2015-12-14 Thread Chris Wilson
With the introduction of requests, we amplified the number of atomic refcounted objects we use and update every execbuffer; from none to several references, and a set of references that need to be changed. We also introduced interesting side-effects in the order of retiring requests and objects. I