On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 21:21 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:09:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 23:41 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > commit 4e5ca60fd35a ("drm/i915: Use ilk_max_pixel_rate() for B
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:09:15PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 23:41 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > commit 4e5ca60fd35a ("drm/i915: Use ilk_max_pixel_rate() for BXT cdclk
> > calculation")
> > tried to change BXT to use ilk_max_pix
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 23:41 +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> commit 4e5ca60fd35a ("drm/i915: Use ilk_max_pixel_rate() for BXT cdclk
> calculation")
> tried to change BXT to use ilk_max_pixel_rate() to compute the
> pipe pixel rate. I failed to notice that the
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 4e5ca60fd35a ("drm/i915: Use ilk_max_pixel_rate() for BXT cdclk
calculation")
tried to change BXT to use ilk_max_pixel_rate() to compute the
pipe pixel rate. I failed to notice that there was another place
in the state readout code that needs the same treatment. So let