On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:22:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:16PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> >> From: Ville Syrjälä
> >>
> >> We need some protection for the FBC state, and since st
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:16PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä
>>
>> We need some protection for the FBC state, and since struct_mutex
>> is it currently in most places, make sure all FBC update/disable
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:16PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> We need some protection for the FBC state, and since struct_mutex
> is it currently in most places, make sure all FBC update/disable
> calles are protected by it.
Why don't you create a new m
From: Ville Syrjälä
We need some protection for the FBC state, and since struct_mutex
is it currently in most places, make sure all FBC update/disable
calles are protected by it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertion
