Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 06:17:30PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary > difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since > interrupts are not shared in the same way. > > The patch i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

From: Ben Widawsky Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since interrupts are not shared in the same way. The patch is mostly a copy-paste of the existing snb+ code, with updates to the relevant parts requ

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:34:05PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary > difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since > interrupts are not shared in the same way. > > The patch i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

From: Ben Widawsky Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since interrupts are not shared in the same way. The patch is mostly a copy-paste of the existing snb+ code, with updates to the relevant parts requ