On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>[...]
> Imre: Patches 18-23
I added my r-b to the above except patch 22, which has a minor issue.
--Imre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Intel-gfx mailing
Hi all,
Just a quick update:
I've started to merge patches into the bdw-stage1 branch of my official
repo. It's also integrated into drm-intel-nightly for integration testing.
I won't reply to individual patches when I do fixups to the patches while
applying since it'll make the massive thread w
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:45:49AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Damien: Patches 24-29
Patches were reviewed, had a glance at them to try to spot anything a
rebase could have done to them with two small improvements that can be
addressed with 2 patches on top if we want to merge things in the next
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:06:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> It is my honor and privilege to submit basic Broadwell support on behalf
>> of Intel.
>>
>> The patch series includes support for Broadwell which should bring it up
>> to feature parity wi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:06:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> It is my honor and privilege to submit basic Broadwell support on behalf
> of Intel.
>
> The patch series includes support for Broadwell which should bring it up
> to feature parity with Haswell. As you'll note, the patches have
> rec
It is my honor and privilege to submit basic Broadwell support on behalf
of Intel.
The patch series includes support for Broadwell which should bring it up
to feature parity with Haswell. As you'll note, the patches have
received some revisions and review already. This is due to our new
process (m
