On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:14:32AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:39:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The patches have changed quite a bit since the RFC, and therefore I
> > didn't feel comfortable trying to do v2 information. I didn't feel
> > comfortable taking the fe
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:39:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The patches have changed quite a bit since the RFC, and therefore I
> didn't feel comfortable trying to do v2 information. I didn't feel
> comfortable taking the few r-bs that I had from the RFC except for the
> one patch that I applie
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:39:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The patches have changed quite a bit since the RFC, and therefore I
> didn't feel comfortable trying to do v2 information. I didn't feel
> comfortable taking the few r-bs that I had from the RFC except for the
> one patch that I applie
The patches have changed quite a bit since the RFC, and therefore I
didn't feel comfortable trying to do v2 information. I didn't feel
comfortable taking the few r-bs that I had from the RFC except for the
one patch that I applied wholesale.
Summary:
- Completely redid the patch splitting.
The n
