Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/17] lvds/dp/watermark refactorings

2012-11-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:14:01PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2012/11/26 Daniel Vetter : > > Hi all, > > > > Second round for my lvds/dp/watermark refactorings, which are a prep work > > for > > the next step in reworking the modeset code (which is currently brewing at a > > rather slow rate in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/17] lvds/dp/watermark refactorings

2012-11-27 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2012/11/26 Daniel Vetter : > Hi all, > > Second round for my lvds/dp/watermark refactorings, which are a prep work for > the next step in reworking the modeset code (which is currently brewing at a > rather slow rate in my modeset-rework branch). Safe where I've disagreed this > should incorporate

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/17] lvds/dp/watermark refactorings

2012-11-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, Second round for my lvds/dp/watermark refactorings, which are a prep work for the next step in reworking the modeset code (which is currently brewing at a rather slow rate in my modeset-rework branch). Safe where I've disagreed this should incorporate all review feedback from Paulo Zanoni.