Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] high-bpp fixes and fdi auto dithering

2013-04-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 01:28:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > The version at Daniel's fdi-dither branch (which is without the hack in > "drm/i915: force bpp for eDP panels") is > > Tested-by: Jani Nikula Meh, I've accidentally merged the broken patch, but that's now fixed again. -Daniel >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] high-bpp fixes and fdi auto dithering

2013-04-25 Thread Jani Nikula
The version at Daniel's fdi-dither branch (which is without the hack in "drm/i915: force bpp for eDP panels") is Tested-by: Jani Nikula on VLV. On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > This fixes all the bugs I've found in my various systems when using non-24bpp > modes as the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] high-bpp fixes and fdi auto dithering

2013-04-19 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:24:32AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > This fixes all the bugs I've found in my various systems when using non-24bpp > modes as the first part of the series. > > And with working non-standard bpp support I've figured we can go fancy and > implemented auto-dit

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] high-bpp fixes and fdi auto dithering

2013-04-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, This fixes all the bugs I've found in my various systems when using non-24bpp modes as the first part of the series. And with working non-standard bpp support I've figured we can go fancy and implemented auto-dithering if we hit an fdi bw limit. Which means that you can now use 3-pipe pch