On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:09:47AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series adds accurate frontbuffer tracking to i915 and then
> > converts
> > psr over to use. Bunch of things still need to be done.
> >
>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series adds accurate frontbuffer tracking to i915 and then converts
> psr over to use. Bunch of things still need to be done.
>
> - PSR needs to be re-tested. I lack the hardware for that. The frontbuffer
>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> - Try to integrate hw gtt write tracking logic. Note that current psr code
>> doesn't rely on this - I've killed the X-tiled checks completely.
>
> Also probably not worth it. In the normal sporadic use, we can rely on
> the GTT being flush
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:20PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Note that currently the gtt tracking has a bit a gap: We never exit it. Bunch
> of
> fixes are possible:
>
> - Wire up the core dirty_fb ioctl to flush framebuffers. This is used by
> generic
> userspace to flush dummy buffers, wh
Hi all,
This patch series adds accurate frontbuffer tracking to i915 and then converts
psr over to use. Bunch of things still need to be done.
- PSR needs to be re-tested. I lack the hardware for that. The frontbuffer
tracking itself is tested.
- PSR igt testcase needs to be extended so that w
