Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:29:56PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:50:36PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > Reposting this as a new series since two of the patches dropped off > > > since last time. > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore

2013-12-17 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:50:36PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Reposting this as a new series since two of the patches dropped off > > since last time. > > > > Functionally it's the same as before. Like before, the patch "drm/i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore

2013-12-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:50:36PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Reposting this as a new series since two of the patches dropped off > since last time. > > Functionally it's the same as before. Like before, the patch "drm/i915: > unleash semaphores on gen8" should probably not be merged as it's not

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] [v2] Broadwell HW semaphore

2013-12-16 Thread Ben Widawsky
Reposting this as a new series since two of the patches dropped off since last time. Functionally it's the same as before. Like before, the patch "drm/i915: unleash semaphores on gen8" should probably not be merged as it's not 100% clear where the hang is currently coming from. Everything else sho