On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:16:57PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:09:04PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 06:09:04PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 PM Ville Syrjälä
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 PM Ville Syrjälä
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Ville
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 PM Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > Looks like getting rid of private_flags is going to
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:35 PM Ville Syrjala
wrote:
> drm/exynos: Use mode->clock instead of reverse calculating it from the
> vrefresh
> drm: Nuke mode->vrefresh
I'm sure this is fine.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
We need one: either clock or refresh settings, so it does make sense
to calcula
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:43 PM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > Looks like getting rid of private_flags is going to be pretty
> > > straightforward. I'll post patches for that once this firs
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:32:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > Looks like getting rid of private_flags is going to be pretty
> > straightforward. I'll post patches for that once this first series
> > lands.
>
> Going all in on crtc state? I suppose mi
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> Looks like getting rid of private_flags is going to be pretty
> straightforward. I'll post patches for that once this first series
> lands.
Going all in on crtc state? I suppose migrating away from private_flags
could easily start in i915 before that. S
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 14:28, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:21:03PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 20:35, Ville Syrjala
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > struct drm_display_mode is extremely fat. Put it on diet.
> > >
> > > Some s
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:27:59PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:21:03PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 20:35, Ville Syrjala
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > struct drm_display_mode is extremely fat. Put it on diet.
> > >
> >
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:21:03PM +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 20:35, Ville Syrjala
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > struct drm_display_mode is extremely fat. Put it on diet.
> >
> > Some stats for the whole series:
> >
> > 64bit sizeof(struct drm_display_mode)
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 20:35, Ville Syrjala
wrote:
>
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> struct drm_display_mode is extremely fat. Put it on diet.
>
> Some stats for the whole series:
>
> 64bit sizeof(struct drm_display_mode):
> 200 -> 136 bytes (-32%)
>
> 64bit bloat-o-meter -c drm.ko:
> add/remove: 1/0 g
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:35:32PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> - Eliminate the second list head somehow?
I think we could just convert that to a boolean, or even just
borrow eg. the one totally free mode->type bit for our internal
use to tag the exposed modes. That would in fact get us down
to 1
From: Ville Syrjälä
struct drm_display_mode is extremely fat. Put it on diet.
Some stats for the whole series:
64bit sizeof(struct drm_display_mode):
200 -> 136 bytes (-32%)
64bit bloat-o-meter -c drm.ko:
add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 29/47 up/down: 893/-1544 (-651)
Function
14 matches
Mail list logo
