Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-05 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:59:19AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:13:10AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > - The build kind of sucks on Arch because of Arch's choices regarding > > python libraries. To build this on Arch, you must run something like: > > ./autogen.sh PY

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-05 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:13:10AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > - The build kind of sucks on Arch because of Arch's choices regarding > python libraries. To build this on Arch, you must run something like: > ./autogen.sh PYTHON_LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib/python3.3 -lpython3.3m" Don't you have a pytho

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-04 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:10:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:13:10AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:22:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:07:52 -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:13:10AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:22:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:07:52 -0800 > > > Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > > > This is my second attemp

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-03 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 12:22:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:07:52 -0800 > > Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > This is my second attempt at winning approval for the series. First one > > > was: https://patchwo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-03 Thread Chris Wilson
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:29:15AM +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:07:52 -0800 > Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > This is my second attempt at winning approval for the series. First one > > was: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1493131/ > > > > In spending the time to rework this

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-03 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:07:52 -0800 Ben Widawsky wrote: > This is my second attempt at winning approval for the series. First one > was: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1493131/ > > In spending the time to rework this tool, I've begun to lose my belief > in some of the original motivations I h

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] [RFC v2] quick dump

2013-02-02 Thread Ben Widawsky
This is my second attempt at winning approval for the series. First one was: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1493131/ In spending the time to rework this tool, I've begun to lose my belief in some of the original motivations I had. Even if you don't want to review, but just like (or dislike) w