Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] SKL/KBL watermark fixes, v2

2016-09-15 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, "Zanoni, Paulo R" wrote: > Em Qua, 2016-09-14 às 12:34 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu: >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new >> > patch, >> > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] SKL/KBL watermark fixes, v2

2016-09-14 Thread Zanoni, Paulo R
Em Qua, 2016-09-14 às 12:34 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new > > patch, > > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude. > > There's a bunch of cc: stable patches mixed wit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] SKL/KBL watermark fixes, v2

2016-09-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new patch, > based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude. There's a bunch of cc: stable patches mixed with non cc: stable patches in the series. Do the cc: stable fixes work and backport

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] SKL/KBL watermark fixes, v2

2016-09-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi Here's the series with the reviews implemented. There's a new patch, based on the additional issue spotted by Lyude. Thanks for all the reviews, Paulo Paulo Zanoni (9): drm/i915: SAGV is not SKL-only, so rename a few things drm/i915: introduce intel_has_sagv() drm/i915/kbl: KBL also nee