Op 17-08-17 om 17:16 schreef Mahesh Kumar:
> Hi,
>
> My bad, I forgot to modify cover-letter before sending series to intel-gfx.
>
> yes this is for upstream consideration.
Thanks, applied. I changed the enableddisabled in the debugfs patch to yesno,
so if you want
to write to it you can use yes
Hi,
My bad, I forgot to modify cover-letter before sending series to intel-gfx.
yes this is for upstream consideration.
-Mahesh
On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:10 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
This is a Trybot Version of series.
What do you mean? Is this fo
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Mahesh Kumar wrote:
> This is a Trybot Version of series.
What do you mean? Is this for upstream consideration or not?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.free
This is a Trybot Version of series.
This series Include patches for:
clean fixed16.16 wrappers
optimize wm calculation code
enable/Implement trans wm calculation
create a DebugFS entry for IPC status
Kumar, Mahesh (8):
drm/i915: Fixed point fixed16 wrapper cleanu
This series Include patches for:
clean fixed16.16 wrappers
optimize wm calculation code
enable/Implement trans wm calculation
create a DebugFS entry for IPC status
Mahesh Kumar (8):
drm/i915: Fixed point fixed16 wrapper cleanup
drm/i915/skl+: Optimize WM calcula
This series Include patches for:
clean fixed16.16 naming & make them consistent
optimize wm calculation code
enable/Implement trans wm calculation
Changes Since V1:
- Split fixed16 cleanup code in more logical patches (Maarten)
- make intel_compute_linetime_wm function st
