On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:15:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So I've grown fed-up with our add-hoc (and pretty much always buggy) return
> > value tracking for testcases with subtests. Furthermore sprinkling tes
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:09:54AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I've grown fed-up with our add-hoc (and pretty much always buggy) return
> value tracking for testcases with subtests. Furthermore sprinkling testcases
> with tons of if (kernel_has_some_optional_feature) return 77; is
Hi all,
So I've grown fed-up with our add-hoc (and pretty much always buggy) return
value tracking for testcases with subtests. Furthermore sprinkling testcases
with tons of if (kernel_has_some_optional_feature) return 77; isn't really
helping test case readability.
So I've gone ahead and impleme
