Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Updated MIPI sequence for BYT

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:31:29PM +0530, Kumar, Shobhit wrote: > On 4/9/2014 8:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:59:29PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > >>Hi, > >>The changes in DSI sequence are as suggested by HW and SV teams. Notable > >>difference apart form few WAs is tha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Updated MIPI sequence for BYT

2014-04-09 Thread Kumar, Shobhit
On 4/9/2014 8:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:59:29PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: Hi, The changes in DSI sequence are as suggested by HW and SV teams. Notable difference apart form few WAs is that for MIPI it is suggetsed that the PORT is enabled before PIPE and PLANE. The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Updated MIPI sequence for BYT

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:59:29PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > Hi, > The changes in DSI sequence are as suggested by HW and SV teams. Notable > difference apart form few WAs is that for MIPI it is suggetsed that the > PORT is enabled before PIPE and PLANE. The patch makes these changes. > So few

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Updated MIPI sequence for BYT

2014-04-09 Thread Shobhit Kumar
Hi, The changes in DSI sequence are as suggested by HW and SV teams. Notable difference apart form few WAs is that for MIPI it is suggetsed that the PORT is enabled before PIPE and PLANE. The patch makes these changes. So few sequence changes, few workarounds and few new feature support like Clocks