On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:56:27AM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:20:33PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> > > As Chris Wilson noticed, my previous patch that did the refactoring as
> > one big
> > > patch which mo
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:20:33PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> > As Chris Wilson noticed, my previous patch that did the refactoring as
> one big
> > patch which moved everything at once was extremely difficult to review
> and
> > maintain.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:20:33PM -0300, Eugeni Dodonov wrote:
> As Chris Wilson noticed, my previous patch that did the refactoring as one big
> patch which moved everything at once was extremely difficult to review and
> maintain. So I split the same refactoring into a series of smaller patches,
As Chris Wilson noticed, my previous patch that did the refactoring as one big
patch which moved everything at once was extremely difficult to review and
maintain. So I split the same refactoring into a series of smaller patches,
which move one subsystem at a time.
As previously, this reduces the
