Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] igt test naming conventions

2013-11-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:04:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > Spurred by the ongoing discussions about improving our tests I've started to > document some of the naming patterns a bit. I've also added a few new ones and > renamed a bunch of tests. > > The idea is that developers ca

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] igt test naming conventions

2013-11-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi all, Spurred by the ongoing discussions about improving our tests I've started to document some of the naming patterns a bit. I've also added a few new ones and renamed a bunch of tests. The idea is that developers can use this patterns to construct add-hoc test groups with piglit's -t/-x opti