On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:33:01PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > Hi Ville,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 December 2013 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:52:27PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 09 December 2013
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:33:01PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> On Tue, 10 December 2013 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:52:27PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09 December 2013 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > There appear to be some gen2 machines that don
Hi Ville,
On Tue, 10 December 2013 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:52:27PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 December 2013 Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > There appear to be some gen2 machines that don't really like the current
> > > PLL
> > > limits we have. We also have so
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:52:27PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> On Mon, 09 December 2013 ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > There appear to be some gen2 machines that don't really like the current PLL
> > limits we have. We also have some accuracy problems with the PLL
> > ca
Hi Ville,
On Mon, 09 December 2013 ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> There appear to be some gen2 machines that don't really like the current PLL
> limits we have. We also have some accuracy problems with the PLL calculations.
> This series aims to eliminate those problems, and at least my 85
There appear to be some gen2 machines that don't really like the current PLL
limits we have. We also have some accuracy problems with the PLL calculations.
This series aims to eliminate those problems, and at least my 855 machine
seems happier with these patches.
Ville Syrjälä (5):
drm/i915: