Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Fix more fallout from reverting atomic hw readout.

2015-06-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 03:10:53PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 12-06-15 om 14:45 schreef Jani Nikula: > > On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Maarten Lankhorst > > wrote: > >> Commit f662af8c5c1619 reverts > >> "drm/i915: Read hw state into an atomic state struct, v2." > >> but it doesn't tak

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Fix more fallout from reverting atomic hw readout.

2015-06-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hey, Op 12-06-15 om 14:45 schreef Jani Nikula: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Maarten Lankhorst > wrote: >> Commit f662af8c5c1619 reverts >> "drm/i915: Read hw state into an atomic state struct, v2." >> but it doesn't take into account other changes that were done in that time. >> Before I continue on t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Fix more fallout from reverting atomic hw readout.

2015-06-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Commit f662af8c5c1619 reverts > "drm/i915: Read hw state into an atomic state struct, v2." > but it doesn't take into account other changes that were done in that time. > Before I continue on the atomic fixes I want to fix the fallout first, > and s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Fix more fallout from reverting atomic hw readout.

2015-06-12 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Commit f662af8c5c1619 reverts "drm/i915: Read hw state into an atomic state struct, v2." but it doesn't take into account other changes that were done in that time. Before I continue on the atomic fixes I want to fix the fallout first, and some of the reasons I identified that could cause a failure