On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:12:39 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:51:55 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Pros:
> > * Potential for per batch, or ring watchdog values. I believe when/if we
> > get to GPGPU workloads, this is particularly interesting.
> > * Batch granularity hang detec
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:51:55 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Pros:
> * Potential for per batch, or ring watchdog values. I believe when/if we
> get to GPGPU workloads, this is particularly interesting.
> * Batch granularity hang detection. This mostly just makes hang
> detection and recovery a bit ea
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:51:55AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> This was my pet project for the last few days, but I have to take a
> break from working on it for now to do some real work ;-). The patches
> compile, and pass a basic test, but that's about it. There is still
> quite a bit of work le
This was my pet project for the last few days, but I have to take a
break from working on it for now to do some real work ;-). The patches
compile, and pass a basic test, but that's about it. There is still
quite a bit of work left to make this useful. The easiest thing would be
to tie this into er
