On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:20:06PM +0530, Singh, Gaurav K wrote:
>
> On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote:
> >>Hi Jani,
> >>
> >>Thanks for the review comments.
> >>
> >>Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my
> >
On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote:
Hi Jani,
Thanks for the review comments.
Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my
3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic.
Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a com
On 11/24/2014 2:31 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote:
Hi Jani,
Thanks for the review comments.
Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my
3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic.
Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a com
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, "Singh, Gaurav K" wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> Thanks for the review comments.
>
> Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my
> 3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic.
>
> Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a comment:
>
> Since in case of dual
Hi Jani,
Thanks for the review comments.
Regarding the first 2 patches, I was doing almost the same thing in my
3rd and 4th patch. But your patches are more generic.
Regarding the 3rd patch, I have a comment:
Since in case of dual link panels, few panels may require sequence to be
sent only
Hi Shobhit and Gaurav -
I've been pondering this whole MIPI DSI pipes vs. ports thing and
discussing with Ville and others. Rather than try and fail in explaining
the ideas, here are some concrete patches to describe what I'd like to
be done first.
The most important thing is that we don't confus
