Quoting Imre Deak (2019-06-04 08:12:22)
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:43:59PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Jun 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-31 23:24:07)
> > >> Separate the display PM from the PCI-level runtime PM.
> > >> I'll follow this up wi
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:43:59PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Jun 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-31 23:24:07)
> >> Separate the display PM from the PCI-level runtime PM.
> >> I'll follow this up with v2 of the rpm encapsulation series [1], but
> >
On Sat, 01 Jun 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-31 23:24:07)
>> Separate the display PM from the PCI-level runtime PM.
>> I'll follow this up with v2 of the rpm encapsulation series [1], but
>> I'd like to get this in before that to avoid having to carry this
>>
Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-05-31 23:24:07)
> Separate the display PM from the PCI-level runtime PM.
> I'll follow this up with v2 of the rpm encapsulation series [1], but
> I'd like to get this in before that to avoid having to carry this
> big dumb diff in that series.
With RUNTIME_PM_D
Separate the display PM from the PCI-level runtime PM.
I'll follow this up with v2 of the rpm encapsulation series [1], but
I'd like to get this in before that to avoid having to carry this
big dumb diff in that series.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/60751/
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2
