Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: fix rb-tree/llist/list confusion

2023-09-28 Thread Mathias Krause
On 28.09.23 13:15, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/09/2023 07:24, Mathias Krause wrote: >> On 05.09.23 13:39, Mathias Krause wrote: >>> Commit 1ec23ed7126e ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine >>> map") introduced a bug regarding engine iteration in default_engines() >>> as th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: fix rb-tree/llist/list confusion

2023-09-28 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
Hi, On 21/09/2023 07:24, Mathias Krause wrote: On 05.09.23 13:39, Mathias Krause wrote: Commit 1ec23ed7126e ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine map") introduced a bug regarding engine iteration in default_engines() as the rb tree isn't set up yet that early during driver initi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: fix rb-tree/llist/list confusion

2023-09-25 Thread Mathias Krause
On 05.09.23 13:39, Mathias Krause wrote: > Commit 1ec23ed7126e ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine > map") introduced a bug regarding engine iteration in default_engines() > as the rb tree isn't set up yet that early during driver initialization. > This triggered a sanity check we h

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: fix rb-tree/llist/list confusion

2023-09-05 Thread Mathias Krause
Commit 1ec23ed7126e ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine map") introduced a bug regarding engine iteration in default_engines() as the rb tree isn't set up yet that early during driver initialization. This triggered a sanity check we have in our grsecurity kernels, fixed by reverting