On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:17 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <
tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
For some reason I has missed this. Thanks Tvrtko for pointing this out.
> On 01/12/2022 22:03, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I was given a link to https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/111494/
> > b
On 01/12/2022 22:03, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
Hi
I was given a link to https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/111494/
but can't seem to find it on the mailing list, so I'll reply here.
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 08:46 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Frontbuffer tracking in gem is used in old driv
Hi
I was given a link to https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/111494/
but can't seem to find it on the mailing list, so I'll reply here.
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 08:46 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Frontbuffer tracking in gem is used in old drivers, but nowadays everyone
> calls dirtyfb expl
Frontbuffer tracking in gem is used in old drivers, but nowadays everyone
calls dirtyfb explicitly. Remove frontbuffer tracking from gem, and
isolate it to display only.
Maarten Lankhorst (2):
drm/i915: Remove gem and overlay frontbuffer tracking
drm/i915: Remove special frontbuffer type
dri
