On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:35:12 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:10:06 +, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > I had to remind myself why both the driver and the kernel are both
> > touching the backlight across DPMS; the answer as I see it is that the
> > kernel only knows about th
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:10:06 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> I had to remind myself why both the driver and the kernel are both
> touching the backlight across DPMS; the answer as I see it is that the
> kernel only knows about the raw backlight interface whereas the driver
> adjusts it via the pref
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:20:41 -0800, Simon Que wrote:
> The operations when setting dpms on should be in the order opposite
> of what's done when setting dpms off.
>
> This is because of potentially conflicting effects:
> ~ drmModeConnectoSetProperty() enables/disables the backlight driver.
> Some
The operations when setting dpms on should be in the order opposite
of what's done when setting dpms off.
This is because of potentially conflicting effects:
~ drmModeConnectoSetProperty() enables/disables the backlight driver.
Some backlight drivers such as intel_backlight set the backlight to 0
