On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:47:28 +0800, zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Zhigang Gong
>
> The previous version calls glamor_egl_close_screen and
> glamor_egl_free_screen manually which is not align with
> standard process. Now glamor change the way to follow
> standard method:
>
> glamor
ris-wilson.co.uk
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Refine CloseScreen and
> InitScreen process.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com
> > [mailto:zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com]
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com [mailto:zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:47 PM
> To: ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com
> Subject: [PATCH] uxa/glamor: Refine CloseScreen a
From: Zhigang Gong
The previous version calls glamor_egl_close_screen and
glamor_egl_free_screen manually which is not align with
standard process. Now glamor change the way to follow
standard method:
glamor layer and glamor egl layer both have their internal
CloseScreens. The correct sequence i
