Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-05-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 02:11:53PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > From: Brad Volkin > > The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this > bit is not required for the actual test case. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670 > Signed-off-by

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-05-10 Thread bradley . d . volkin
From: Brad Volkin The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this bit is not required for the actual test case. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin --- This is a resend of http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/20

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-22 Thread Volkin, Bradley D
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:47:57AM -0700, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:12:28AM -0700, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:20:30PM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:22:16PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com > > > wrote: > > > > From

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:12:28AM -0700, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:20:30PM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:22:16PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > > > From: Brad Volkin > > > > > > The command parser in newer kernels will reject it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-09 Thread Volkin, Bradley D
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:20:30PM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:22:16PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Brad Volkin > > > > The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this > > bit is not required for the actual test case. > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:20:30AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:22:16PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Brad Volkin > > > > The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this > > bit is not required for the actual test case. > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:22:16PM -0700, bradley.d.vol...@intel.com wrote: > From: Brad Volkin > > The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this > bit is not required for the actual test case. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670 > Signed-off-by

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gen7_forcewake_mt: Don't set the GGTT bit in SRM command

2014-04-08 Thread bradley . d . volkin
From: Brad Volkin The command parser in newer kernels will reject it and setting this bit is not required for the actual test case. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76670 Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin --- tests/gen7_forcewake_mt.c | 55 +--