Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_fence_trash: make threaded tests more through-rough

2013-04-08 Thread Chris Wilson
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:23:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > With this at least the y-tiled test reliably fails on my machines, but > x-tiled still passes on some. More ideas to tune this highly welcome. > > v2: Fill cpu caches with data for each newly allocated bo. This seems > to do the tric

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_fence_trash: make threaded tests more through-rough

2013-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
With this at least the y-tiled test reliably fails on my machines, but x-tiled still passes on some. More ideas to tune this highly welcome. v2: Fill cpu caches with data for each newly allocated bo. This seems to do the trick on my snb here _really_ reliably. So apparently the backsnoop for llc g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_fence_trash: make threaded tests more through-rough

2013-04-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > With this at least the y-tiled test reliably fails on my machines, but > x-tiled still passes on some. More ideas to tune this highly welcome. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Correction: Y-tiled still seems to not fail on my snb mobile gt2.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/gem_fence_trash: make threaded tests more through-rough

2013-04-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
With this at least the y-tiled test reliably fails on my machines, but x-tiled still passes on some. More ideas to tune this highly welcome. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- tests/gem_fence_thrash.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_fen