Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] meh, failure to git add

2012-10-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > I'm missing some context here... but why not just run 'sysctl > kernel.printk=8' wherever this is needed? It leaked from my private dotfiles repo. The reason against a cmdline option is the need to walk over to the box ;-) This thing here is p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] meh, failure to git add

2012-10-26 Thread Jani Nikula
I'm missing some context here... but why not just run 'sysctl kernel.printk=8' wherever this is needed? BR, Jani. On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Daniel Vetter wrote: > From: root > > --- > bin/set_debug_dmesg.c | 8 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 bin/set_debug_dmesg.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] meh, failure to git add

2012-10-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
From: root --- bin/set_debug_dmesg.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 bin/set_debug_dmesg.c diff --git a/bin/set_debug_dmesg.c b/bin/set_debug_dmesg.c new file mode 100644 index 000..d61394a --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/set_debug_dmesg.c @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +#include